<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Important Page On Your Church Website: The Home Page, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchcommunicationspro.com/2006/11/20/the-all-important-church-website-home-page-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchcommunicationspro.com/2006/11/20/the-all-important-church-website-home-page-part-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:53:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cory Miller</title>
		<link>http://churchcommunicationspro.com/2006/11/20/the-all-important-church-website-home-page-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchcommunicationspro.com/2006/11/20/the-all-important-church-website-home-page-part-1/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Tom, understand your perspective (I just left my late 20s) ... but I&#039;ve served on two church staffs and this has been a recurring and hard issue to deal with. On my church site now, it&#039;s a stock photo. There are problems inherent with using a &quot;real&quot; family ... but I tried to choose one who looked &quot;normal.&quot;

It&#039;s a question we all struggle with ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, understand your perspective (I just left my late 20s) &#8230; but I&#8217;ve served on two church staffs and this has been a recurring and hard issue to deal with. On my church site now, it&#8217;s a stock photo. There are problems inherent with using a &#8220;real&#8221; family &#8230; but I tried to choose one who looked &#8220;normal.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a question we all struggle with &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://churchcommunicationspro.com/2006/11/20/the-all-important-church-website-home-page-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchcommunicationspro.com/2006/11/20/the-all-important-church-website-home-page-part-1/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>On stock photography, I&#039;m in my late 20&#039;s and am very cynical about presentation, etc.  (So those are my presuppositions that shape how I think.)  If I see stock photography on a church website, I run the other way.  I&#039;d rather see a poorly designed site using frames and a flash intro than see happy, shiny models on the home page of a church website.

When I see models, I immediately revert to high school mode and think &quot;this must be a church for only cool, beautiful people.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On stock photography, I&#8217;m in my late 20&#8217;s and am very cynical about presentation, etc.  (So those are my presuppositions that shape how I think.)  If I see stock photography on a church website, I run the other way.  I&#8217;d rather see a poorly designed site using frames and a flash intro than see happy, shiny models on the home page of a church website.</p>
<p>When I see models, I immediately revert to high school mode and think &#8220;this must be a church for only cool, beautiful people.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
